|
The National Gallery's exhibition explores the artworks owned by artists such as Freud |
I imagine it can be difficult for large galleries to find
unique ways to show off their collection. Sometimes the links can be tenuous
(this was one of the main criticisms of Tate Britain’s Fighting History exhibition last year). Yet, the National Gallery
has found a really fascinating link between many works in its possession: the
artworks owned by famous artists, who were often inspired by the pieces on
their walls. The exhibition displays key pieces in the private collections of eight
artists: Freud; Matisse; Degas; Leighton; Watts; Lawrence; Reynolds; and Van
Dyck.
|
Loving the sunshine outside the National Gallery |
Starting with Freud, the exhibition draws a link between the
items he possessed and the work he went on to create. He was clearly drawn to
realism in the portraiture of the likes of Constable, Corot and Cezanne. A
comparison was drawn between Cezanne’s Afternoon
in Naples (1875) and Freud’s After
Cezanne (2000). Although the difference in styles is obvious, it is clear
that Freud was influenced by the post-impressionist. On face value, it seems
the composition and subject matter is the main thing the paintings have in
common, but when observing the paint strokes, it is clear Freud was interested
in Cezanne’s expression conveyed with thick and fast layers of paint. However,
the issues dealt with in the pieces are quite different. Cezanne’s intimate piece shows a loving
couple who could be in brothel whilst Freud has turned the narrative more sour
by exploring a more contemporary theme of isolation and sexual dependence. This
is perhaps why Freud referred to the two pieces as “cousins”.
|
Cezanne's Afternoon in Naples (1875) |
|
Freud's After Cezanne (2000) |
Another piece in Freud’s collection was the main catalyst
for the exhibition. Corot’s Italian Woman
(1870) was given to the nation by Freud and is interesting in the fact that
Corot was far better known for his landscapes. Freud clearly preferred
portraiture, as he also owned a portrait by Constable, another famous landscape
artist. Freud was fascinated with the
way Corot’s woman emerged from darkness and the emotion etched into her face with
thick, expressive brushstrokes. This piece hung above Freud’s mantelpiece
underneath which was Degas’ Head of a
Woman Resting on One Hand (1834), another portrait which explores a similar
psychological complexity which is seen in many of Freud’s works.
|
Corot's Italian Woman (1870) |
|
Degas' Head of a Woman Resting on One Hand (1834) |
I found this tangible relationship between painter and the
paintings he possessed fascinating. However, occasionally there seems to be
looser connections in the exhibition. For instance, the link drawn between
Cezanne’s Three Bathers (1882) and
Matisse’s Back III (1916). The
exhibition states a Matisse was inspired by Cezanne to reduce the body to its
essential elements and emphasise a stylised bulk. I felt that although the
subject matter is the same, the final artworks created are very different.
Cezanne’s fluid brushstrokes make his bathers seem more comfortable and smooth
whereas Matisse’s sharp angles and choice of dark bronze as the medium portrays
a darker emotion. I think in this instance the relationship is more of an
inspiration rather than a copy or tribute.
|
Cezanne's Three Bathers (1882) |
|
Matisse's Back III (1916) |
One of the most successful elements of the exhibition was
the way it also explored the personal relationships the artists had to each
other. For instance, Degas supported young impressionists by buying their
paintings but would often return their pieces after quarrels. Gauguin in
particular benefited from Degas’ generosity: he had 11 of the artist’s
painting. Degas felt Forain imitated him and once said “he paints with his
hands in my pockets.’ Quotes about Degas’ compulsive art collecting were
printed on the walls. My favourites include “I buy! I buy! I can’t stop myself!”
and Albert Bartholome’s analysis of the artist: “and the next morning he starts
again: still Ingres, some Delacroix… and then he takes a certain pride in
announcing he can no longer afford to clothe himself.” (1896). Similarly,
Reynolds spoke of art collecting: “The possessing of portraits by Titian, Van
Dyke, Rembrandt… I considered the best kind of wealth.” It really provided a
fascinating insight into the men as both artists and collectors.
|
A Personal Insight: Reynolds had tried to exchange Gainsborough's Girl With Pigs (1782) for a Titian |
This exhibition was successful in the links it created
between the vastly different works in the collections, whilst also creating an
intimate viewpoint into the relationships between all of the artists and their
most personal works.
No comments:
Post a Comment